The Write Edit

Premier Editing Services

Writers in the Age of COVID

By Leave a Comment

Authors and writers are a unique bunch for tons of reasons, and how COVID-19 has affected us is no different. As a realist/optimist, I have chosen to see the bright spot – that this virus has delivered a doozy of a chance to write, write, write. While I am heartbroken for those out of work (and for about two months, I was one of those people), I am also encouraged by the wealth of writing opportunities this insipid virus has delivered to writers, authors, and poets. If you haven’t yet pitched any COVID-19-inspired ideas to editors, what are you waiting for?

I suspect that article pitches based on how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected your life will be sought after by many publications for a long time to come. As writers, here is your chance to pitch your unique story to editors hungry for content. The common pitch rules apply: research the online or print venue you are interested in submitting to, pitch to a specific editor if possible, adhere to the publication’s query guidelines (for example, do they want a query letter or a written article?), and compose a professional, well-written, engaging piece.

For authors, COVID-19 has provided material for you as well. If you have a powerful story to tell about your personal journey with this virus, get started on your book proposal now. The questions below can apply to articles as well as full-length manuscripts.

These are some questions you might consider addressing in your COVID-19 article or manuscript:

1) Have I learned anything about myself as a result of this global shut-down? If so, what surprised me most?

2) Did I lose any friends or family members to this virus? If so, how did this affect me differently than it would have if I had lost them to something else?

3) Have I contemplated my own mortality for the first time? What did that look like?

4) How did the correlations between COVID-19 and its political implications affect my view of others in my country or my government? Did it change anything significantly in me?

5) Did a close family or friend relationship take a severe hit during this pandemic/political crisis? Did it cost me a relationship with them?

6) Did I become more (or less) religious or spiritual because of the COVID-19 pandemic?

7) How have I changed because of the COVID-19 virus and the political uprisings that occurred simultaneously? Will this be a permanent change?

8) Did anything positive come out of my personal battle with COVID-19?

9) Did the quarantine cause my spouse and me to divorce? Did it repair our marriage?

10) Did I change political parties during COVID-19? Why?

11) Did I lose my job because of COVID-19? How has that influenced my future?

12) Did working from home change my view on the workplace?

13) How did COVID-19 change my perspective on the need for human interaction?

Whatever you choose to write about, nothing about your article or essay can be ordinary. What you’ve discovered must be significant, relatable, and profound in such a way that you are no longer the same person you were before this pandemic hit. Your story must stand out, or it will end up in the slush pile. You can rise above the others by being honest, vulnerable, and revelatory.

For authors, include important research. You do not have to be a physician or scientist to write a book about COVID-19. This will be your personal story, a memoir. But because it will center on a medical condition, facts and figures matter.

As a writer or author, you have the opportunity to use COVID-19, and the political backdrop that surrounded it, to express and even cathartically process your personal story. You just have to write it.

Meeting Your Literary Idol

By 1 Comment

In the ’90s I lived in a suburban area just outside Philadelphia, and the main newspaper there was The Philadelphia Inquirer (it still is). It’s like the New York Times of Pennsylvania. The paper ran a humor column by a journalist named John Woestendiek, and I lived for Sundays and Wednesdays when I could read it. I’d dash out the door to buy the Inquirer so I could see what Seinfeld-esque commentary my literary idol would tickle me with. As a budding writer myself, I developed a serious writer’s crush on John and decided one day to contact him. I had no idea how this would change my life.

I have crushes on literary idols like others have crushes on film stars. The only actor I have a serious crush on is Hugh Laurie. But I digress. I’ve always had this desire to reach out and touch those whose talent I admire. This would later translate into working for a high-profile talent agency in New York. So I wrote a note to Mr. Woestendiek. I told him how much I loved his column, that I was a writer too, and that he made me laugh on Sundays and Wednesdays. I figured I’d get some form letter from his assistant. Did I mention he was also a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist? Yup, he helped free a man wrongly convicted of murder.

But to my surprise he wrote back. We even developed an online literary relationship, where I would test my humor writing skills on him and he would respond. I recall writing something where he said, “This made me laugh. I might have even chortled.” I made John Woestendiek chortle.

Fast forward—he invited me to meet him at a Philadelphia Inquirer social at a restaurant in downtown Philly. After changing my outfit 8 times, I grabbed my friend Susan (also a writer) for support and went. I pretended in front of all his colleagues to be a crazed fan who recognized him from the newspaper (his headshot accompanied his column), and played it up for all the drama I could muster. They believed my shenanigans and teased John mercilessly. I was surprised at how humble and shy John was. This made me admire him even more.

Fast forward to now—we have been friends ever since. He has even come to New Mexico with his dog and stayed in my home.

At the most recent Editorial Freelancers Association conference in Chicago, I had a similar experience. This time I met a literary idol of another type: Louise Harnby, editor extraordinaire. As I stood there in the ballroom on night one, with two other colleagues, the three of us giggled like high schoolers as we watched Louise talk to someone at the bar. One colleague said, “Oh my God, don’t look now, but there’s Louise Harnby.” Of course I looked, and there she was, the mighty redheaded goddess of editing chatting away with someone. The two women I were with were way too nervous to approach her, so I finally announced, “I’m going in!”

I walked up to Louise and said, pointing behind me, “See those two women over there? I’m with them and we all have a girl crush on you.” She smiled and said “Really?” I said yes and that I thought I’d be the brave one to come over. She then motioned for them to join us, even though one of them looked mortified. The next thing I knew, the four of us, plus Ruth E. Thaler-Carter, another editor phenom, were standing in a huddle chatting. I said to Louise, “Please don’t take this the wrong way but I have one of your books in my bathroom.” She responded, in her splendid British accent, “Your baaah-throom? I love it!” I said, “Oh, good, because I don’t read just any book in my bathroom.”

We all then took a group photo. All I could think was, Louise Harnby just touched me.

Why did I write this? A few reasons. One is that I suck at networking, but when I threw my fear in the toilet and just plunged ahead, I was able to make connections, both of which I suspect will be lifelong (Louise and I are now Facebook friends). The second is that writing is a solitary profession, so it’s necessary to be proactive in forging associations with others—you never know what might come of them, professionally and personally. The third is that meeting people—especially people you find interesting—can lead to ideas for books, articles, and other writing prospects. It’s one thing to scrutinize your surroundings to stimulate the imagination and quite another to actively seek out people you already hold in high regard. Another reason? It’s fun! It’s exciting to see their response. Literary heroes are becoming more accessible these days through social media, and most of them respond positively to fans of their work.

If you’ve had an experience of meeting a literary hero, please share it here. If you haven’t, I encourage you to go for it! Now if I could only get Hugh Laurie to have lunch with me . . .

 

 

Is Your Dialogue Too Realistic?

By 3 Comments

Have you ever thought about what dialogue sounds like in real life? Most of it is boring. “What time will you be home today?” “I ate the last slice of pizza.” When an author tries to incorporate real-life dialogue into their novel, it can put the reader to sleep. Dialogue that is too realistic will kill the drama and bore the reader.

Am I saying you should create otherworldly dialogue? No, not unless your particular novel calls for it. Keep it realistic, but don’t mimic real life. Fiction dialogue should be rich and compelling. The ordinariness found in day-to-day exchanges is the death knell for fiction dialogue. So … realistic? Yes, don’t let it sound forced, but keep it engaging.

Make sure your dialogue is reflective of the character’s desires, personality, and quirks. For example, whether your character says, “Don’t need no stinkin’ cops on my ass” or “I apologize, ma’am, for my error in judgment” or “I reckon you need to shut your pie hole and mosey on along,” the reader should be able to create an image of this person.

Dialogue should be used in instances where narration is not enough. Both should move the story along, but dialogue should offer deeper insight into the relationship between the characters who are speaking to each other. If the dialogue sounds mundane, that’s a clue that you need narration instead or not even that if it doesn’t impact the story.

As an editor, I could spend 50 blogs on discussing dialogue, but for now I have created a bulleted list of what good dialogue is and isn’t:

* Good dialogue elevates ordinary language. 

* Good dialogue will always hint at the character’s temperament, desires, motivation, or state of mind.

* Good dialogue will move the story along.

* Good dialogue will sound realistic to the extent that characters might interrupt each other, not finish their sentences, or incorporate other quirks of conversational speaking.

* Good dialogue consists of an exchange that is necessary. Ask yourself if the story will suffer if you cut the conversation. If the answer is no, cut it.

* Bad dialogue mimics real-life speech.

* Bad dialogue includes mundane speech that is not impactful or relevant to the story.

* Bad dialogue is ordinary, unless specifically called for in the world of the story. For example, Hi. How are you? I’m fine. What’s new?

* Bad dialogue includes lines the author wants to use because he or she believes “they sound good” but don’t really fit in the world of the story.

I hope this helps next time you’re writing dialogue. Thoughts, opinions, and questions are always welcome!

 

Should You Phone or Email Your Editor?

By 2 Comments

Whenever a client (or potential client) wants to talk on the phone, I silently cry inside, “Editors don’t do phone!” I’m kidding of course, but not completely. By nature, editors are most comfortable with the written word and therefore prefer to communicate by email. If an author wants to speak to me, I will, even if my palms sweat a bit at the thought. There are benefits to speaking to an author on the phone, but there are also disadvantages. Whether to call or email your editor is a matter of personal preference. Pros and cons lie with both.

call-me-13286064Pros to Phoning Your Editor:

1) Spontaneity: Interaction on the phone can lead to unplanned conversations or details about your project. It might even lead to a new project.

2) Some things can be more easily explained on the phone.

3) Phone calls can eliminate the back-and-forth emailing of “Is this what you mean?” You get everything nailed down in one (or two) conversations.

4) Talking on the phone gives that personal touch. Nice? Sure. But I’ve had clients for years whose voices I’ve never heard, and yet I feel close to them. Note that this is not an editorial advantage but a human perk.

Pros to Emailing Your Editor:

email me1) You have everything in writing. As an editor, I often refer back to see what the author wanted—did he or she want me to pay special attention to dialogue? Comment on chapter length? Note character inconsistencies? As a writer, you can review previous conversations and often find answers to questions that come up. Even if you and your editor decide to put in writing everything you discussed on the phone, you will not recall everything, and you both might remember things differently.

2) Email creates a permanent record of communication that can always be referenced.

3) E-mail allows you to think about exactly what you want to say and then detail it in a well-thought-out note. When speaking, people interrupt each other, lose their train of thought, or think of things after they hang up.

4) People are generally less intimidated in email. The author-editor relationship is based on openness and honesty, which is easier to maintain in email.

5) Email exchanges can be revisited as often as desired, which can result in new perspectives. How many times have you reread an email and thought, “Huh, I didn’t notice that the first time?”

call or email

About my preference for email? I like to think about what I’m going to say. My spontaneous answers are never as good as my reflective ones. And I always want to offer the best possible answers/work/solutions to my clients. I liken this to first drafts. They are never your best work, right? Phone calls are like your first drafts. Emails are (or can be) your final copy.

Now that I’ve expounded the virtues of calling and emailing your editor, with an obvious bias for emailing, I must disclose the fact that once I get started in the editing process, my clients rarely even find the need to email me. The emailing usually occurs before the project begins. By the time I start, they have a solid idea of what will be done with their manuscript, document, or website. When I return the edited document, I make it clear that they are welcome to ask any questions related to the edits. I check my email a gazillion times a day. My phone will almost always go to voicemail, but I will return your call … even if it makes my eye twitch a little.

If you do talk to your editor on the phone, remember to keep the chit-chat to a minimum. As excited as you might be about your new puppy (who wouldn’t be?) or the latest sensation on Netflix, your editor needs to get started on your project, so have those questions and/or details ready to go!

As always, happy writing!